ISSN: 2960-1959
Publisher
Original Articles

Comparing ChatGPT and Google Bard: Assessing AI-Powered Information Retrieval in Nursing

Yousif M. Mahmood
Smart Health Tower, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq
Rebaz O. Mohammed
Smart Health Tower, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq
Imad J. Habibullah
Bakhshin Medical Community Halabja, Halabja, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq
Hawbash M. Rahim
Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, University of Human Development, Kurdistan Region, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Abdulwahid M. Salih
College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq
Abstract
420
Downloads
210
Published: February 6, 2024
PDF
PDF

Abstract

Introduction

In healthcare, rapid access to accurate information is essential, especially for nurses who make critical decisions. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promise in this context, with ChatGPT and Google Bard being notable AI-driven information retrieval tools.

Methods

This study evaluated ChatGPT and Google Bard's performance by assessing their responses to 50 diverse medical knowledge questions, covering infection control, vital signs, CPR, and more, and comparing their response to the correct answers.

Results

ChatGPT achieved a 64% accuracy rate, while Google Bard achieved 56%. Both models agreed on key medical concepts, but disagreements emerged in some areas, highlighting disparities in their responses. Nurses' expertise in patient-centered care, clinical judgment, and communication complements AI. AI aids in providing evidence-based information but cannot replace nurses' human touch and critical thinking. Integrating AI into nursing education enhances learning and prepares professionals for evolving healthcare landscapes.

Conclusion

ChatGPT and Google Bard have strengths and weaknesses, making them valuable aids but not substitutes for nurses. Ethical considerations are vital as AI continues to shape healthcare. Nurses must ensure ethical AI use while upholding their commitment to compassionate care.

References

  1. McFarland A, MacDonald E: Role of the nurse in identifying and addressing health inequalities. Nurs Stand. 2019, 34:37–42. 10.7748/ns.2019.e11341 doi:10.7748/ns.2019.e11341
  2. Yoo JY, Kim JH, Kim JS, Kim HL, Ki JS: Clinical nurses’ beliefs, knowledge, organizational readiness and level of implementation of evidence-based practice: The first step to creating an evidence-based practice culture. PLoS One. 2019, 14:e0226742. 10.1371/journal.pone.0226742. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226742
  3. Nibbelink CW, Brewer BB: Decision-making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2018, 27:917–28. 10.1111/jocn.14151. doi:10.1111/jocn.14151
  4. McGrow K: Artificial intelligence: Essentials for nursing. Nursing (Lond). 2019, 49:46–9. 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000577716.57052.8d. doi:10.1097/01.NURSE.0000577716.57052.8d
  5. Robert N: How artificial intelligence is changing nursing. Nurs Manage. 2019, 50:30–9. 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000578988.56622.21. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000578988.56622.21
  6. Sallam M: ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthc (Basel, Switzerland). 2023, 11:. 10.3390/healthcare11060887. doi:10.3390/healthcare11060887
  7. Dave T, Athaluri SA, Singh S: ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations. Front. Artif. Intell. 2023, 6:. doi:10.3389%2Ffrai.2023.1169595.
  8. Irwin P, Jones D, Fealy S: What is ChatGPT and what do we do with it? Implications of the age of AI for nursing and midwifery practice and education: An editorial. Nurse Educ. Today. 2023, 127:105835. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105835
  9. Hirosawa T, Mizuta K, Harada Y, Shimizu T: Comparative Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy Between Google Bard and Physicians. Am J Med. Published Online First: August 2023. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.08.003
  10. Salih AM, Mohammed BA, Hasan KM, Fattah FH, Najmadden ZB, Kakamad FH, Ahmed SM, Kareem HO, Mohammed SH, Abdalla BA. Mitigating the Burden of meningitis outbreak; ChatGPT and Google Bard Recommendations for the general populations; general practitioners and pediatricians. Barw Medical Journal. 2023 May 31. doi:10.58742/bmj.v1i2.32
  11. Salih AM, Mohammed NA, Mahmood YM, Hassan SJ, Namiq HS, Ghafour AK, Asaad SK, Kakamad SH, Abdullah F, HamaSalih HM, Karim M. ChatGPT Insight and Opinion Regarding the Controversies in Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Barw Medical Journal. 2023 Sep 18. doi:10.58742/bmj.v1i2.48
  12. Muhialdeen AS, Ahmed JO, Baba HO, Abdullah IY, Hassan HA, Najar KA, Mikael TM, Mustafa MQ, Mohammed DA, Omer DA, Bapir R. Kscien’s List; A New Strategy to Discourage Predatory Journals and Publishers (Second Version). Barw Medical Journal. 2023 Mar 1. doi:10.58742/bmj.v1i1.14
  13. Scerri A, Morin KH: Using chatbots like ChatGPT to support nursing practice. J Clin Nurs. 2023, 32:4211–3. doi:10.1111/jocn.16677
  14. Miao H, Ahn H: Impact of ChatGPT on Interdisciplinary Nursing Education and Research. Asian/Pacific Isl. Nurs. J. 2023, 7:e48136. 10.2196/48136. doi:10.2196/48136
  15. Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh RP: ChatGPT for healthcare services: An emerging stage for an innovative perspective. BenchCouncil Trans Benchmarks, Stand Eval. 2023, 3:100105. doi:10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100105
  16. Banks J: The Human Touch: Practical and Ethical Implications of Putting AI and Robotics to Work for Patients. IEEE Pulse. 2018, 9:15–8. doi:10.1109/MPUL.2018.2814238
  17. Pepito JAT, Babate FJG, Dator WLT: The nurses’ touch: An irreplaceable component of caring. Nurs open. 2023, 10:5838–42. doi:10.1002/nop2.1860
  18. Morrow E, Zidaru T, Ross F, Mason C, Patel KD, Ream M, Stockley R: Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13:971044. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971044
  19. Ronquillo CE, Peltonen L-M, Pruinelli L, et al.: Artificial intelligence in nursing: Priorities and opportunities from an international invitational think-tank of the Nursing and Artificial Intelligence Leadership Collaborative. J Adv Nurs. 2021, doi:77:3707–17. 10.1111/jan.14855
  20. Patil NS, Huang RS, van der Pol CB, Larocque N: Comparative Performance of ChatGPT and Bard in a Text-Based Radiology Knowledge Assessment. Can Assoc Radiol J = J l’Association Can des Radiol. 2023, 8465371231193716. doi:10.1177/08465371231193716
  21. Taira K, Itaya T, Hanada A: Performance of the Large Language Model ChatGPT on the National Nurse Examinations in Japan: Evaluation Study. JMIR Nurs. 2023, 6:e47305. doi:10.2196/47305
  22. De Gagne JC: The State of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: Past, Present, and Future Directions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2023, 20:. doi:10.3390/ijerph20064884
  23. Buchanan C, Howitt ML, Wilson R, Booth RG, Risling T, Bamford M: Predicted Influences of Artificial Intelligence on Nursing Education: Scoping Review. JMIR Nurs. 2021, 4:e23933. doi:10.2196/23933
  24. Seibert K, Domhoff D, Bruch D, Schulte-Althoff M, Fürstenau D, Biessmann F, Wolf-Ostermann K: Application Scenarios for Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: Rapid Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021, 23:e26522. doi:10.2196/26522
  25. Sauerbrei A, Kerasidou A, Lucivero F, Hallowell N: The impact of artificial intelligence on the person-centred, doctor-patient relationship: some problems and solutions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023, 23:73. doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02162-y
  26. Farhud DD, Zokaei S: Ethical Issues of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Healthcare. Iran. J. Public Health. 2021, 50:i–v. doi:10.18502/ijph.v50i11.7600
  27. Naik N, Hameed BMZ, Shetty DK, et al.: Legal and Ethical Consideration in Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Who Takes Responsibility? . Front. Surg. 2022, 9:. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.862322

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Keywords
Copyright (c) 2024 Barw Medical Journal Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Send mail to Author

Send Cancel
Copyright© Barw Publications 2023. All rights reserved
Themes by Openjournaltheme.com